Skip to Main Content
Need Support? Let’s guide you to the right answer or agent.
ADD A NEW IDEA

SPIDAcalc

Add support for WMS 1.3 compliant map tile requests and/or configurable BBOX units

Without setting up a proxy to handle SPIDAcalc's non-compliant map tile requests, there is no way to correctly align overlays with SPIDAcalc's default basemap options. Current Functionality: When requesting map tiles, SPIDAcalc always formats the ...
9 days ago in SPIDAcalc Needs review

Multi selecting poles in the lead list

When working on large numbers of poles, it's useful to separate them into categories such as Telco-only, Power-only, Joint Use, etc for easier report export. But when moving poles between leads you can only select one at a time and the list doesnt...
6 months ago in SPIDAcalc Planned

Spacer Cable Deadend option

Looking for a deadend option that maintains the conductor spacing.
2 months ago in SPIDAcalc Future consideration

Create lead from Project selection

This is an extension of the idea SPIDA-I-34: https://spida.ideas.aha.io/ideas/SPIDA-I-34 Current Functionality: When a new lead is created, it creates a new location. Requested Functionality: When a new lead is created, prompt the user: "Create ne...
4 months ago in SPIDAcalc Needs review

Map tools for manipulating Project structure

Similar to SPIDA-I-34 and SPIDA-I-43 Because Map view already allows selecting multiple locations, it might be a good place for tools that help with managing the lead and location structure of large project files. Requested Functionality: Create L...
4 months ago in SPIDAcalc Needs review

Show selected wire's ruling span in map view

Currently: If multiple poles in map view are selected, the estimate ruling span is shown. If a connected wire is selected, the poles/spans associated with that wire are highlighted in map view. Is it possible to "combine" these features so t...
4 months ago in SPIDAcalc Needs review

Multi Select Wire Disconnect

No description provided
3 months ago in SPIDAcalc Planned

Bidirectional / Positional Clearance Rules

Enable clearance rules that are orientation-agnostic (apply regardless of which attachment is above or below) and optionally allow different minimum clearances depending on the relative position. Current rules require an upper-attachment → lower-a...
6 months ago in SPIDAcalc Needs review

Configure clearance by WEP type

Request to update the clearances configuration to allow for setting the WEP type(s) to which a midspan clearance should apply. This would allow creating reduced clearance tables for services to buildings as described in NESC 2023, Table 232-1, Foo...
6 months ago in SPIDAcalc Needs review

Center pole top mounted equipment

Currently, equipment is modeled on the face of the pole. For pole top mounted equipment (such as antennas), this leads to the equipment being centered on the face of the pole rather than the center of the pole, which offsets the equipment's weight...
3 months ago in SPIDAcalc Needs review